Labour tax plan ‘could stop parents passing on homes to kids’
Necessary Land Debates Now Please: LJN/Labour tax inherited homes; LVT; Population; Planet of the Humans...
Under current laws, inheritance tax affects 640,000 households, but Labour's proposed Lifetime Gifts Tax (LGT) would affect up to 10 million homes.
Though the Land Justice Network Facebook page denied it - it was indeed true...
LJN, George Monbiot and the Labour party teamed up last year to write a Labour policy to tax almost all inherited homes rather than just the most expensive. The result was a sneaky move in 'Land For The Many' which would force millions of children out of homes if their parents die
Labour tax plan could stop parents passing on homes to kids https://metro.co.uk/2019/07/01/labour-tax-plan-stop-parents-passing-homes-kids-10095642/
If you think inheritance tax is hated now, wait until Labour tries to bring in a lifetime gift tax with a £125,000 limit
This is just one contradiction in land campaign policy emerging as 'mogadon' Starmer looks set to hand Boris a decade in power. BTW here's why Corbyn lost and no it wasn't the media IMO https://www.rt.com/op-ed/475891-corbyn-general-election-destroyed/
Now some on the 'left' have even turned on filmmaker Michael Moore's Planet of the Humans for exposing the massive investment nightmare taking over renewables, every bit as bad as the fossil fuel lobby - basically saying the same money is just shifting to greenwash you can watch PotH here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk11vI-7czE and download it as an mp4 to watch/edit using this tool
Apoplexy is the order of the day among green energy zealots following the release of Mike Moores Planet of The Humans. In the military they call it blue on blue, although when the hard left are pulling the trigger its more aptly described as green on green. But the documentary backed by Moore isnt so much friendly fire, as an all-out assault on the billionaire hypocrites who whipped up fear and frenzy over changes in the weather and then, as if by magic, produced the notional solution to the calamity in the form of heavily subsidised wind, solar and forest-munching biomass. A solution which, of course, they are all heavily invested in.
How did Michael Moore become a hero to climate deniers and the far right?
Our founder, George Monbiot has used his Guardian column to condemn the film, accusing Michael Moore of being in league with the far right, yeah right, there has been no actual debate whatever
But possibly the most important discussion is about population - as so called environmentalist Prince Charles appears to insist that three quarters of the world's population drops dead for his convenience
Prince Charles warns that we will need 'four planets like earth to survive' as we just 'take and take' and urges companies to focus on the 'green recovery' following coronavirus The Prince of Wales spoke via recorded message from Balmoral, Aberdeenshire He stated that at current rate we would need 'four planets like earth to survive'
Philip at a Nazi funeral and the day his sister had lunch with Hitler: TV documentary reopens painful chapter of duke's family past
Okay, I'll wind up this, my call to debate, with this recent article about food and population on Medium - (below)
If anyone else would like to help organise these sorts of socially distanced debate events do please let me know
Tony Gosling www.thisweek.org.uk www.bilderberg.org/PI www.911forum.org.uk 07786 952037
Environmental Justice or Eugenics? Prince Charles Says We Must Reduce World Population By Three Quarters
We produce enough food to feed 10 billion people. So why does hunger still exist? Jeremy Erdman Feb 2, 2018 4 min read
This is the second article of seventeen exploring the challenges of each of the United Nations Seventeen Sustainable Development Goals. Today, 795 million people are hungry. Another 2 billion are expected to join them by 2050. However, global food production is incredibly efficient. The worlds farmers produce enough food to feed 1.5x the global population. Thats enough to feed 10 billion (we are at 7.6 billion currently). Despite this excess, hunger still exists. How is that possible?